<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Conjecture &#124; Your Daily Dose of Blafangarr!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.conjecture.ca/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.conjecture.ca</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 04:59:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>J&amp;J Sued by Consumers Over Children&#8217;s Cold Medicines‎</title>
		<link>http://www.conjecture.ca/2010/07/jj-sued-by-consumers-over-childrens-cold-medicines%e2%80%8e/</link>
		<comments>http://www.conjecture.ca/2010/07/jj-sued-by-consumers-over-childrens-cold-medicines%e2%80%8e/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Jul 2010 04:56:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conjecture.ca/?p=465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Johnson &#038; Johnson, the world’s largest health-products company, was sued by U.S. consumers accusing it of fraud and racketeering, and demanding cash refunds for recalled children’s cold and allergy medicines. In five complaints seeking class-action, or group, status filed yesterday in federal court in Chicago, the consumers spurned an offer by J&#038;J’s McNeil Consumer Healthcare [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Johnson &#038; Johnson, the world’s largest health-products company, was sued by U.S. consumers accusing it of fraud and racketeering, and demanding cash refunds for recalled children’s cold and allergy medicines.</p>
<p>In five complaints seeking class-action, or group, status filed yesterday in federal court in Chicago, the consumers spurned an offer by J&#038;J’s McNeil Consumer Healthcare and McNeil- PPC Inc. units for refund coupons and demanded cash.</p>
<p>The coupons are “worthless” because McNeil has stopped making the medicines and “wrongly assumes that all consumers will want to purchase the company’s children’s products at some uncertain future date,” according to the complaints.</p>
<p>The companies on April 30 recalled more than 40 types of pediatric pain and allergy drugs saying their quality and potency didn’t meet internal requirements. Among the products it named were children’s formulations of liquid Tylenol, Motrin and Benadryl. J&#038;J’s over-the-counter medicines and nutritionals unit had revenue of $1.21 billion in the first quarter.</p>
<p>Bonnie Jacobs, a spokeswoman for New Brunswick, New Jersey based J&#038;J, said consumers can request a refund or coupon at mcneilproductrecall.com. She declined to comment further, saying that as a policy the company doesn’t discuss litigation.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.conjecture.ca/wp-content/uploads/2010/07/cold_medicine-520x361.jpg" alt="" title="cold_medicine" width="520" height="361" class="aligncenter size-large wp-image-466" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.conjecture.ca/2010/07/jj-sued-by-consumers-over-childrens-cold-medicines%e2%80%8e/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MoPo &#124; Geek News Video Clips Forum</title>
		<link>http://www.conjecture.ca/2006/08/mopo-geek-news-video-clips-forum/</link>
		<comments>http://www.conjecture.ca/2006/08/mopo-geek-news-video-clips-forum/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Aug 2006 20:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>luapo</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Action]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conjecture.ca/mopo-geek-news-video-clips-forum/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MoPo Geek News100&#8242;s Arcade Flash Games ForumFunny Video Clips]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.mopo.ca/" target="_blank">MoPo Geek News</a><br /><a href="http://forum.mopo.ca/activity.php" target="_blank">100&#8242;s Arcade Flash Games</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.mopo.ca" target="_blank"><img style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; CURSOR: hand; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://www.conjecture.ca/uploaded_images/mopo-logo-739543.jpg" border="0" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://forum.mopo.ca/" target="_blank">Forum</a><br /><a href="http://www.mopo.ca/clips" target="_blank">Funny Video Clips</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.conjecture.ca/2006/08/mopo-geek-news-video-clips-forum/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dumb Laws Of Alabama</title>
		<link>http://www.conjecture.ca/2006/01/dumb-laws-of-alabama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.conjecture.ca/2006/01/dumb-laws-of-alabama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 11:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lavatyme</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conjecture.ca/dumb-laws-of-alabama/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AnnistonYou may not wear blue jeans down Noble Street. AuburnNo person may spit on the floor of a church.It is unlawful for any person to spit upon the sidewalks, or upon the floors of places of worship, buses, public halls, theaters or other public places. Alabama HuntsvilleIf an animal control officer is in uniform, it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div align="left"><strong>Anniston<br /></strong>You may not wear blue jeans down Noble Street.</p>
<p><strong>Auburn</strong><br />No person may spit on the floor of a church.It is unlawful for any person to spit upon the sidewalks, or upon the floors of places of worship, buses, public halls, theaters or other public places.</p>
</div>
<p><a href="http://www.conjecture.ca/uploaded_images/alabama-bb-752106.jpg"><img style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; CURSOR: hand; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="" src="http://www.conjecture.ca/uploaded_images/alabama-bb-749784.jpg" border="0" />
<p align="center">Alabama</p>
<p></a>
<p align="left"><strong>Huntsville<br /></strong>If an animal control officer is in uniform, it signifies to the public that he is an animal control officer</p>
<p><strong>Lee County<br /></strong>It is illegal to sell peanuts in Lee County after sundown on Wednesday </p>
<div align="left"><strong>Mobile<br /></strong>&#8216;Spray String&#8217; is banned.<br />It is illegal to howl at ladies within the city limits.<br />It is unlawful to wear women&#8217;s pumps with sharp, high heels </div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.conjecture.ca/2006/01/dumb-laws-of-alabama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2-year-old Kaylee Called for Jury Duty</title>
		<link>http://www.conjecture.ca/2006/01/2-year-old-kaylee-called-for-jury-duty/</link>
		<comments>http://www.conjecture.ca/2006/01/2-year-old-kaylee-called-for-jury-duty/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 11:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lavatyme</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conjecture.ca/2-year-old-kaylee-called-for-jury-duty/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NEW BEDFORD, Mass. (AP) &#8211; Kaylee Reynolds had a problem when she recently received a summons to serve on a Taunton District Court jury. She wasn&#8217;t old enough to read it. The two-year-old has quite a few years to go before she reaches the minimum age of 18 to serve on a state jury. Lucky [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>NEW BEDFORD, Mass. (AP) &#8211; Kaylee Reynolds had a problem when she recently received a summons to serve on a Taunton District Court jury.</p>
<p>She wasn&#8217;t old enough to read it. The two-year-old has quite a few years to go before she reaches the minimum age of 18 to serve on a state jury. Lucky for Kaylee, Massachusetts Jury Commissioner Patricia Wood seemed willing to let it slide for a while.</p>
<p>&#8220;We&#8217;ll give her a 16-year grace period,&#8221; Wood told the Standard-Times of New Bedford.</p>
<p>Wood guessed the mixup could be traced to a local census form. If the form has a blank or mistaken birth date, July 4, 1776 is filled in.</p>
<p>&#8220;With that date we&#8217;ll know it is wrong,&#8221; Wood said.</p>
<p>Besides her questionable understanding of the concepts of guilt or innocence, there are other reasons why it&#8217;s best to wait for Kaylee to serve. Her mother, Patricia, says Kaylee gets really cranky if she doesn&#8217;t get her noontime nap.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.conjecture.ca/2006/01/2-year-old-kaylee-called-for-jury-duty/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hostage-taking  Ends Peacefully; Hostilo Unharmed</title>
		<link>http://www.conjecture.ca/2006/01/hostage-taking-ends-peacefully-hostilo-unharmed/</link>
		<comments>http://www.conjecture.ca/2006/01/hostage-taking-ends-peacefully-hostilo-unharmed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jan 2006 11:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lavatyme</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conjecture.ca/hostage-taking-ends-peacefully-hostilo-unharmed/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[STATESBORO, Ga. (AP) &#8211; A couple surrendered Tuesday after holding a lawyer hostage in his office for more than 24 hours and telling authorities they were armed with an explosive device The suspects, Robert Eugene Brower, 43, a former client of the lawyer, and Connie Brower, have been charged with kidnapping, police said, adding that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>STATESBORO, Ga. (AP) &#8211; A couple surrendered Tuesday after holding a lawyer hostage in his office for more than 24 hours and telling authorities they were armed with an explosive device</p>
<p>The suspects, Robert Eugene Brower, 43, a former client of the lawyer, and Connie Brower, have been charged with kidnapping, police said, adding that more charges could be filed.</p>
<p>Police Chief Stan York said police found an explosive device of a &#8220;pyrotechnic type.&#8221; He did not elaborate.</p>
<p>At a news conference Monday night, York said Brower was angry about having been convicted in a criminal case in which Hostilo was his court-appointed lawyer. York would not elaborate on the couple&#8217;s demands, saying only they wanted to call attention to the case. Schnall said he did not know what type of case Hostilo handled for Brower.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.conjecture.ca/2006/01/hostage-taking-ends-peacefully-hostilo-unharmed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Uwe Max Jensen Fined for Pretending to Urinate</title>
		<link>http://www.conjecture.ca/2006/01/uwe-max-jensen-fined-for-pretending-to-urinate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.conjecture.ca/2006/01/uwe-max-jensen-fined-for-pretending-to-urinate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2006 13:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lavatyme</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conjecture.ca/uwe-max-jensen-fined-for-pretending-to-urinate/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Uwe Max Jensen, a painter known for decorating house walls, claimed it was an artistic stunt that was not meant to be indecent. He told the court in Herning, 270 kilometres west of Copenhagen, that he pretended to urinate by concealing a plastic bag containing water in his trousers and squeezing water on a wall.The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Uwe Max Jensen, a painter known for decorating house walls, claimed it was an artistic stunt that was not meant to be indecent.</p>
<p>He told the court in Herning, 270 kilometres west of Copenhagen, that he pretended to urinate by concealing a plastic bag containing water in his trousers and squeezing water on a wall.<br />The court said it wasn&#8217;t necessary to establish whether he urinated or sprinkled water. It deemed his conduct &#8220;obscene&#8221; and unlawful, and fined him $165 US.</p>
<p>Jensen, 33, was reported to police following the July 11 incident at a house in Brande on the outskirts of Herning.</p>
<p>Police initially fined him $330, but he refused to pay. The court on Monday reduced the fine by half.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.conjecture.ca/2006/01/uwe-max-jensen-fined-for-pretending-to-urinate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Flying Shrimp Kills Colaitis Lawsuit Pending</title>
		<link>http://www.conjecture.ca/2006/01/flying-shrimp-kills-colaitis-lawsuit-pending/</link>
		<comments>http://www.conjecture.ca/2006/01/flying-shrimp-kills-colaitis-lawsuit-pending/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lavatyme</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conjecture.ca/flying-shrimp-kills-colaitis-lawsuit-pending/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A shrimp a hibachi chef tossed at a man eating at a Japanese steakhouse ultimately led to the diner&#8217;s death, his family claims in a $10 million US wrongful death lawsuit against the restaurant chain Benihana Jerry Colaitis, 43, wrenched his neck when he ducked to avoid the shrimp in the chain&#8217;s Munsey Park restaurant, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A shrimp a hibachi chef tossed at a man eating at a Japanese steakhouse ultimately led to the diner&#8217;s death, his family claims in a $10 million US wrongful death lawsuit against the restaurant chain Benihana</p>
<p>Jerry Colaitis, 43, wrenched his neck when he ducked to avoid the shrimp in the chain&#8217;s Munsey Park restaurant, lawyer Andre Ferenzo said in opening statements Wednesday.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.conjecture.ca/uploaded_images/images-739071.jpg"><img style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; CURSOR: hand; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="shrimp" src="http://www.conjecture.ca/uploaded_images/images-735391.jpg" border="0" /> <center>Shrimp Fights Back</center></a><br />Benihana lawyer Charles Connick said it was unlikely a chef who works for tips would toss food at customers after being asked not to, as Ferenzo claimed. Even if that happened, Connick added, the cause of Colaitis&#8217; death was an infection or neck injury unrelated to the shrimp</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.conjecture.ca/2006/01/flying-shrimp-kills-colaitis-lawsuit-pending/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Frito-Lay Target of Olestra Lawsuit</title>
		<link>http://www.conjecture.ca/2006/01/frito-lay-target-of-olestra-lawsuit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.conjecture.ca/2006/01/frito-lay-target-of-olestra-lawsuit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 11:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lavatyme</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conjecture.ca/frito-lay-target-of-olestra-lawsuit/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CSPI Wants Court to Order Labels on Frito Lay “Light” Chips to Warn of Diarrhea, Stomach Cramps. Frito-Lay has been notified that it will be sued by a Massachusetts consumer for deceptively marketing its line of “Light” potato chips. Those chips are made with olestra—the controversial fat substitute that causes diarrhea, stomach cramps, and other [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CSPI Wants Court to Order Labels on Frito Lay “Light” Chips to Warn of Diarrhea, Stomach Cramps. Frito-Lay has been notified that it will be sued by a Massachusetts consumer for deceptively marketing its line of “Light” potato chips. Those chips are made with olestra—the controversial fat substitute that causes diarrhea, stomach cramps, and other unappetizing symptoms.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.conjecture.ca/uploaded_images/frito_logo-751211.jpg"><img style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; CURSOR: hand; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="Frito-lays Logo" src="http://www.conjecture.ca/uploaded_images/frito_logo-748804.jpg" border="0" /> <center>Not Everyone is Smiling</center></a></p>
<p>“I remember learning about the effects of olestra, so never in a million years would I have knowingly purchased potato chips that contain it,” said Lori Perlow, the plaintiff. “I was driving my car when my symptoms hit. Frankly I feel lucky to have reached my destination in one piece.”</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.conjecture.ca/2006/01/frito-lay-target-of-olestra-lawsuit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Baucums Sue to Keep Pet Chickens</title>
		<link>http://www.conjecture.ca/2006/01/the-baucums-sue-to-keep-pet-chickens/</link>
		<comments>http://www.conjecture.ca/2006/01/the-baucums-sue-to-keep-pet-chickens/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 10:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lavatyme</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conjecture.ca/the-baucums-sue-to-keep-pet-chickens/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Shreveport couple has sued the city over its order to get rid of the chickens they keep as pets at their home. The City Council in November told Mary and Ralph Baucum they couldn&#8217;t keep their three hens in pens behind their house. Having lost at city hall, the Baucums has appealed to a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Shreveport couple has sued the city over its order to get rid of the chickens they keep as pets at their home.</p>
<p>The City Council in November told Mary and Ralph Baucum they couldn&#8217;t keep their three hens in pens behind their house. Having lost at city hall, the Baucums has appealed to a Caddo District Court judge, asking him to &#8220;spot zone&#8221; their property to allow them to keep raising three to four chickens.<br /><a href="http://www.conjecture.ca/uploaded_images/chicken-749112.jpg"><img style="DISPLAY: block; MARGIN: 0px auto 10px; CURSOR: hand; TEXT-ALIGN: center" alt="Pet Chicken" src="http://www.conjecture.ca/uploaded_images/chicken-733494.jpg" border="0" /> <center>Pet Chicken</center><center></center>
</p>
<p></a>The Baucums for years have kept about half a dozen hens as pets in a pen behind their house. But a neighbor complained to the city, saying the birds infected her dog with an illness stemming from bird droppings.</p>
<p>The Metropolitan Planning Commission last fall approved a zoning variance that allowed the Baucums to keep hens as pets. That was appealed to the City Council, which overruled the MPC.</p>
<p>Ralph Baucum says several friends have offered to take their chickens.</p>
<p>(Copyright 2006 by The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.conjecture.ca/2006/01/the-baucums-sue-to-keep-pet-chickens/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lawsuit Against FBI : Mistaken Fingerprint Match</title>
		<link>http://www.conjecture.ca/2006/01/lawsuit-against-fbi-mistaken-fingerprint-match/</link>
		<comments>http://www.conjecture.ca/2006/01/lawsuit-against-fbi-mistaken-fingerprint-match/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Jan 2006 09:48:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>lavatyme</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.conjecture.ca/lawsuit-against-fbi-mistaken-fingerprint-match/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Justice Department report that faulted the FBI for sloppy work may strengthen a lawsuit filed against the agency by a Portland man who was arrested after his fingerprints were mistakenly identified during the investigation into the 2004 Madrid train bombings. Justice Department Inspector General Glenn Fine faulted the FBI for mistakenly matching a fingerprint [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A Justice Department report that faulted the FBI for sloppy work may strengthen a lawsuit filed against the agency by a Portland man who was arrested after his fingerprints were mistakenly identified during the investigation into the 2004 Madrid train bombings.</p>
<p>Justice Department Inspector General Glenn Fine faulted the FBI for mistakenly matching a fingerprint found on a bag of detonators near the Madrid bombing site to those of Mayfield.</p>
<p>Mayfield was jailed for two weeks in May 2004 — even though Spanish investigators disagreed with the FBI’s fingerprint analysis. The FBI acknowledged the mistake on May 24 and apologized to Mayfield.</p>
<p>He sued the Justice Department and the FBI in October 2004, claiming he was singled out because of his Muslim faith and that searches of his home and other locations were in violation of the Fourth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution, which protects against unreasonable search and seizure.</p>
<p>Precht, who recently left the University of Michigan to return to private practice in New York, said the pressure on investigators and prosecutors is enormous once they believe they have the right suspect.</p>
<p>“This is a textbook example of people having assumed a person’s guilt, and then they look for evidence to confirm it,’’ Precht said</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.conjecture.ca/2006/01/lawsuit-against-fbi-mistaken-fingerprint-match/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

